Skip to content

Oxford University Comparative Law Forum

  • Editorial
  • Editors
  • Submit
  • Articles
  • Authors
  • Citation
  • Copyright
  • Disclaimer
  • Subscribe
Oxford University Comparative Law Forum

Category Archives: Camilo A. Rodriguez-Yong

The Doctrines Of Unconscionability And Abusive Clauses: a Common Point Between Civil And Common Law Legal Traditions

Leave a reply

By Camilo A. Rodriguez-Yong*

(2011) Oxford U Comparative L Forum 1 at ouclf.law.ox.ac.uk | How to cite this article

Table of contents

  • Introduction
  • 1. The Doctrine of Unconscionability
  • 2. The Doctrine of Abusive Clauses
  • 3. The Doctrines of Unconscionability and Abusive Clauses – Are They So Different?
  • 3.1. The Doctrines of Unconscionability and Abusive Clauses Arise as a Consequence of the Abuse of Right to Contract
  • 3.2. The Doctrines of Abusive and Unconscionable Contract or Clause Apply to Agreements Imposed or Drafted by Only One of the Parties
  • 3.3. The Party Who Has Drafted the Contract or Clause Has More Bargaining Power than the One Who Accepts the Contract
  • 3.4. The Doctrines of Unconscionability and Abusive Clauses Arise in Contracts Where There is a Significant Imbalance Between the Rights and Obligations Assumed by the Parties
  • 3.5. The Control Mechanisms Used to Avoid the Inclusion of Unconscionable and Abusive Clauses
  • 4. Conclusion
  • Endnotes

Continue reading →

This entry was posted in 2011, Articles, Camilo A. Rodriguez-Yong on March 19, 2026 by Christoph.Koenig.

Last Publication

  • At the Expense of the Claimant: Direct and Indirect Enrichment in English Law
  • In Defence of Unjust Factors: a study of rescission for duress, fraud and exploitation
  • In Defence of Unjust Factors
  • Illegality as Defence Against Unjust Enrichment Claims.
  • The Role of Illegality in the English Law of Unjust Enrichment.

No comments to show.
Proudly powered by WordPress